ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO THE EIS
PAGE 17 – SEE IMAGE AT RHS – STAKEHOLDER DATABASE
There is no representation of Castaways, Marcus Beach, Peregian Beach residents under the primary flight path on this graphic. This is because the majority of those residents, postcode 4573, weren’t aware of the proposed flight path as they weren’t informed.
Stands at Peregian Springs and Noosaville are at the furthest geographical point from those affected beachside residents. The map used for noise on display does not reference those areas at all. PAGE 8 IMAGE RHS.
PAGE 8 – no inclusion of primary flight path residents on sound contour map on display
PAGE 9 – SAME DOCUMENT – COMMUNITY GROUP STAKEHOLDER BRIEFINGS – NO REFEERENCE TO GREEN FLIGHT PATH COMMUNITY GROUPS
ONE REFERENCE FOR EUMUNDI
PAGE 18 – 987 SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED / 880 PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS – VERY LITTLE REPRESENTATION FROM A COMMUNITY UNAWARE OF THE PROPOSAL
PAGE 51 – STATES THE PROJECT WILL NOT IMPACT ON NOOSA RIVER WETLANDS – NO STUDY DONE TO CONFIRM THIS
SUPPLIED BELOW INITIAL MAP INDICATING “SECONDARY APPROACH CORRIDOOR” PAGE 179